“I don’t know where he came from,
nor who or what he was.”
If Bilbo can be compared (at least by trolls and such) to a clever rabbit, Gollum is a wicked little frog. Though many people – understandably – are fascinated by his more complex portrayal in The Lord of the Rings, I think I actually prefer Gollum as the nasty, enigmatic creature in The Hobbit. During the riddle game, Gollum thinks of “all the things he kept in his own pockets: fish-bones, goblins’ teeth, wet shells, a bit of bat-wing, a sharp stone to sharpen his fangs on, and other nasty things.”
There is something fascinating about a petty little creature without a history that possesses a great Ring of Power. As a fallen hobbit, Gollum is a tragic figure. As an evil frog-thing, he is something less nuanced but more exotic – almost a weak and corrupted version of Tom Bombadil's incarnation of natural energies, a slimy paddler in the dark and nameless pools of the mountains, a gurgle of malice gnawing at the stone heart of the world.
Image: Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis (purple frog), by Karthickbala
No comments:
Post a Comment